Observing Project - The STAR List

Mark Deprest and I have embarked on a year long observing project.  This will be to photograph and sketch all of the "STAR" (Small Telescope Asterism Roster) objects.  The STAR list was started by author Philip S. Harrington and the original objects were called "Harrington" objects.  These were listed in his book "Touring The Universe Through Binoculars".  As other observers contributed more and more objects Philip changed the name to the STAR list.  Later objects were listed in the book "The Deep Sky - An Introduction".  A total of 29 objects are currently listed (there is some suspicion that STAR 5 and STAR 17 are the same object - this has been confirmed by Philip)  Neither Mark or I have any connection with Mr. Harrington except for reading his books but I must say that both of these books are great and have a prominent spot in my astro library.

This looks to be a wonderful group of asterisms that are all large to medium in size.  These lend themselves to binoculars and small telescopes with wide fields.  Sporting names like Kemble's Cascade, The Golf Putter and The Queens Kite they are spread out all over the sky visible from the northern hemisphere.

This will be a long term project - it is not practical to think that good sketches and photos can be taken in the space of weeks or months.  What I hope to do here is keep a running log of the work being done and preview some of the results.  I am hopeful that a nice club program can be made from the final results of our efforts. 

The planned list, caged from Mr. Harrington's books, looks like this:

STAR Number

Constellation

Time of Year

Size

Focal Length

RA

DEC

Name

1

Ursa Minor

Summer

45'

600 mm

2h 32m

89d 0m

Diamond Ring

2

Fornax

Summer

30' X 30'

2500 mm

3h 27m

-35d 0m

Chi 1,2,3

3

Camelopardalis

Winter

150'

600 mm

4h 0m

63d 0m

Kemble's Cascade

4

Auriga

Winter

75'

600 mm

5h 19m

33d 40m

Flying Minnow

5

Monoceros

Winter

15'

2500 mm

6h 41m

-9d 0m

Arrow Head

6

Leo Minor

Spring

45'

600 mm

10h 14m

31d 30m

Sailboat Cluster

7

Hercules

Summer

100' X 15'

600mm

16h 18m

13d 0m

Zig Zag

8

Telescopium

Summer

15'

2500 mm

18h 30.4m

-46d 08m

X Marks The Spot

9

Delphinus

Summer

60' X 30'

600 mm

20h 38m

13d 10m

Theta Delphini

10

Cygnus

Summer

600' X 180'

135 mm

21h 0m

55d 0m

Dark Lane

11

Cepheus

Summer

600' X 300'

135 mm

21h 48m

61d 0m

Cephus OB2 Ass'n

12

Cassiopeia

Autumn

60'

600 mm

23h 20m

62d 20m

Airplane

13

Cassiopeia

Autumn

220' X 160'

300 mm

1h 38m

58d 30m

Queen's Kite

14

Andromeda

Autumn

20' X 95'

600 mm

1h 52.5m

37d 30m

Golf Putter

15

Cassiopeia

Autumn

90' X 30'

600 mm

3h 28m

72d 0m

Kemble's Kite

16

Taurus

Winter

200' X 90'

300 mm

4h 22.5m

21d 25m

Davis' Dog

17

Monoceros

Winter

10'

2500 mm

6h 40.5m

-9d 0m

Unicorn's Horn

18

Monoceros

Winter

600 mm

6h 52.5m

-10d 10m

Pakan's 3

19

Ursa Major

Spring

20'

2500 mm

10h 51.0m

56d 09m

Broken engagement Ring

20

Corvus

Spring

15'

2500 mm

12h 35.7m

-12d 02m

Stargate

21

Virgo

Spring

15'

2500 mm

12h 38.5m

-11d 30m

Jaws

22

Ursa Minor

Summer

15'

2500 mm

16h 29m

80d 13m

Mini - Coathanger

23

Hercules

Summer

20'

2500 mm

16h 37.8m

31d 05m

Backwards 5

24

Hercules

Summer

15'

2500 mm

18h 02.5m

26d 18m

25

Draco

Summer

10' X 20'

2500 mm

18h 35m

72d 25m

Little Queen

26

Cygnus

Summer

45'

1600 mm

20h 13.8m

36d 30m

Red Necked Emu

27

Delphinus

Summer

15'

2500 mm

21h 07.3m

16d 20m

Dolphin's Diamonds

28

Cygnus

Summer

25'

2500 mm

21h 08.3m

47d 14m

Horseshoe

29

Cassiopeia

Autumn

70' X 125'

600 mm

23h 03m

59d 30m

Lucky 7

As we go along I will make any corrections to the list that are necessary.  We will list the full information for the sketches and the photos.

This is going to be especially nice for me as I have not seen most of these asterisms.  In point of fact, I saw STAR 3, Kemble's Cascade, for the first time at the beginning of March.  I was using a pair of inexpensive 10 X 46 binoculars and I kept returning and just gazing at the tumbling line of stars - it was amazing!

Mark is a highly skilled observer with a great knowledge of the night sky.  I will unashamedly glom onto his coattails and learn from him as we progress with this work.  

 

Mark Deprest on "Star Colors",

Drawings made at the eyepiece can be wonderfully accurate representations of what can be seen through the various optical aids that we use to view the night sky. But can be somewhat disappointing when set next to the "detail – rich" astrophotographs of the same object. A simple black on white drawing that is scanned then inverted to give a white on black image makes a huge difference in the visual impact of the drawing. But, if there was a way to show the subtle differences in the "color" of the stars, in these drawings then we would have very accurate, as well as visually exciting representations of what one could expect to see when one puts their eye to the ocular. This is what I wanted to accomplish in my drawings for this project; one of the impressive things that I have always observed in clusters and tight groups of stars is the differences in the "star – colors." The problem was how to add "star – color" to black and white drawings, with compromising the integrity of the "At the Eyepiece" drawing. After experimenting with a number of different methods, I found one that actually produced very accurate results. I will describe it further on in this text, but I think you will find it, not only visually pleasing but also quite accurate.

Since, "star – color" can be very subjective and some observers I know rarely see any colors other than black sky and white stars. I wanted to make sure that the stars I gave any "color" to, very strongly showed that particular hue. Very quickly I realized that there were only four different "colors" that I could discern when noticing any contrast in the stars’ hues. Blue, yellow, red and white, (wow, the primary colors with a default) were the only truly obvious colors I could grasp, the only caveat being their respective intensities. I also noticed that the center of even the reddest stars still looked white to me. That’s when the method for "coloring" my stars came to me. I needed to give the outer edges of the stars color and the centers needed to stay white. This was accomplished by producing a negative (white on black) of my original pencil and paper drawings and a simple paint program that had an "airbrush" option. Using a circle stylist or brush and varying the size, I was able to get that edged color fading out but was left with a deeply colored center, simply reduce the brush size and change the color back to white, and "BINGO" stars with color.

The color of these stars was determined at the scope also using very detailed charts produced with a planetarium type program and copious notes taken at the scope. These notes and the charts helped me determine the intensity each colored star should have. I hope you will enjoy them.

The paint program I used was MGI Photo Suite and the planetarium program used was Guide 7.0 by Project Pluto.

 

PROJECT RESULTS:

 

Clay Kessler on "Star Clutter"

Taking the photos for this project is going to be a little different than normal astrophotography. If I were taking the usual type of photo the goal would be to get as much light and stars on the negative as possible. I have noticed that with other "constellation" type shots the faint background stars get so numerous that it is difficult to see the familiar stars that provide the outline. With the first three shots taken last weekend I find this to be even more true for these small asterisms. Let me give some examples:

For STAR 3 I took two shots. One was a 10 minute exposure and one was a 20 minute exposure. When I scanned the negatives I found that even the 10 minute exposure was over-run with stars. It was easy to see NGC 1502, and the general shape of the "cascade" was discernable but the large number of stars obscured the view of the asterism. It was nowhere near the same as the view through my binoculars. The 20 minute shot, while well guided and filled with stars, was unusable for the intended purpose. The solution? – Adobe Photoshop! What I ended up doing was setting the background levels to give a nice neutral black background. Then I lowered the "mid-tone" levels until many of the faint stars disappeared. This allowed the asterism to stand out from the crowd of stars and this is the result used on the page. I found this to be the case with all three shots. I was, indeed, somewhat surprised that the shot of STAR 4 picked up a lot of red nebulosity from the adjacent IC 405 and IC 417 in the brief 10 minute exposure.

As a comparison, I will process these shots "normally" and post them in the "Astrophoto" section of my site. The lesson learned early here is that "Star Clutter" in this type of shot is likely to be a problem and that a 10 minute exposure with my 4" f6 refractor is TOO LONG! I will be trying some shorter exposures on future imaging expeditions and I will experiment with exposure times using the 10" SCT that will be required to properly frame some of the smaller STAR objects.

I notice that the latest "Astronomy" magazine has a nice article on asterisms with accompanying photographs. I read the article with interest but the photos were so dense with stars I could not easily find the asterisms in them. I will try to combine exposure and processing to avoid this "Star Clutter" and show these asterisms in all their glory.

 

Keep an eye on this page after the new moon weekends and I will try to post updates as weather and available time permit.